we intend to hold policy at a restrictive level until we’re confident that inflation is moving down sustainably toward our objective.”
Powell’s main hawkish line was to say that officials are “prepared to raise rates further if appropriate, and we intend to hold policy at a restrictive level until we’re confident that inflation is moving down sustainably toward our objective.”
Dots showed a central bank expecting to keep rates higher than it had expected three months ago, and for longer.
The dots even show that 12 of 19 officials favor another rate hike in one of the last two meetings of 2023.
The FOMC also lives in the shadow of the dreadful mistakes of the 1970s, when rates were cut too soon and stagflation resulted.
It seems Powell has really convinced the market that he’s not sure why the economy is still so strong.
Sometimes honesty is the best policy.
At one point Wednesday afternoon, the markets appeared to be reacting negatively to Jerome Powell of the Federal Reserve, as he admitted to uncertainty — some said confusion — over the direction of the economy.
Naturally, that’s worrying when it comes from the head of the world’s most powerful monetary institution. But there’s also an element of reassuring believability. If anyone tells me with certainty where the US economy is heading at present, I’m inclined not to trust them. I’m sure many feel the same way.
And so Powell’s acknowledgement of uncertainty in these strange times seems to have given him more credibility. As a result, his attempt to execute a “hawkish pause” — no change in interest rates while convincing the market that higher rates were more likely in the future — succeeded. Bond yields rose, and stocks fell.
John Authers Bloomberg 21 September 2023
The Federal Reserve’s internal debate about the “neutral” real rate of interest is heating up.
The neutral rate, or r-star, is the inflation-adjusted policy stance that neither stimulates nor restrains the economy. The rate is impossible to observe in real time, yet policymakers have been subtly revising up their estimates of what they think it might be. And some observers are making sensational claims about the significance of the moves.
Jerome Powell doesn’t seem to place much stock in estimates of neutral. In speeches going back to 2018, he has spelled out his cautiousness when dealing with the macroeconomic “star variables” (including r-star and its close relative, u-star, the natural rate of unemployment).
Jonathan Levin Bloomberg 20 september 2023
How long can the world’s borrowers hold on as higher interest rates bite? It all comes down to R-Star
https://englundmacro.blogspot.com/2023/09/how-long-can-worlds-borrowers-hold-on.html
“the financial stability interest rate” (which they call r**,
not to be confused with r*, the neutral interest rate) —
the threshold interest rate above which the central bank triggers a problem of financial stability.
Niall Ferguson Bloomberg 18 december 2022
https://englundmacro.blogspot.com/2022/12/the-threshold-interest-rate-above-which.html
Fed är beredd att höja räntan ytterligare om det behövs. Powell did not discuss the prospects of a higher R-star on Friday, but...
Powell did not discuss the prospects of a higher R-star on Friday, but said: “we cannot identify with certainty the neutral rate of interest, and thus there is always uncertainty about the precise level of monetary policy restraint”.
Key Takeaways From Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s Jackson Hole Speech
https://englundmacro.blogspot.com/2023/08/fed-ar-beredd-att-hoja-rantan.html
https://englundmacro.blogspot.com/search/label/Star
Kommentarer